2025/6, Trimester 1, In Person, Edinburgh Napier University
VIEW FULL DETAILS
| Occurrence: | 001 |
| Primary mode of delivery: | In Person |
| Location of delivery: | MERCHISTON |
| Partner: | Edinburgh Napier University |
| Member of staff responsible for delivering module: | Mina Jowkar |
| Module Organiser: | |
| Student Activity (Notional Equivalent Study Hours (NESH)) |
| Mode of activity | Learning & Teaching Activity | NESH (Study Hours) | NESH Description |
| Face To Face | Lecture | 3 | Lectures provide comprehensive guidance on essential professional skills, including teamwork, time management, presentation techniques, and effective communication. |
| Independent Learning | Practical classes and workshops | 30 | Practical classes and workshops include: three Monitored Team Meetings (MTMs) for assessing individual contributions and team dynamics; a discipline-specific advice session with programme leaders to address student queries; and two practice presentations - one outlining and one final - to receive feedback from the module leader. |
| Online | Guided independent study | 367 | Students will work independently within interdisciplinary teams to propose a sustainable community using modern construction methods. The development proposal must include a mix of residential, commercial, and community spaces, incorporating leisure and cultural facilities. |
| Total Study Hours | 400 | |
| Expected Total Study Hours for Module | 400 | |
| Assessment |
| Type of Assessment | Weighting % | LOs covered | Week due | Length in Hours/Words | Description |
| Reflective Log | 20 | | Not Yet Determi | , WORDS= 5000 words±10% | As part of the Self and Peer Review Report, students are required to reflect on both their own performance and that of their teammates. This includes recognizing individuals who made outstanding contributions to the team’s objectives, as well as identifying any members whose performance may have fallen short.The review process is intended to help students gain insight into their strengths and areas for improvement within a team setting, ultimately supporting the development of their skills, collaboration, and overall effectiveness in group work. |
| Discussion/Participation | 30 | | Week 3 | HOURS= 30 Mins/Team | Monitored Team Meetings (MTMs) are similar to internal team meetings but include the presence of module leaders, who attend to assess individual contributions, team dynamics, and overall progress. Each team is allocated a 30-minute time slot, during which all students from each discipline must attend and provide a clear update on their completed work as well as their plans for the upcoming week.Students are expected to come fully prepared with concise, structured updates. Team leaders are responsible for submitting a meeting agenda in advance to guide the discussion effectively.MTMs are designed to complement regular internal meetings and ensure that all team members have equal opportunities to contribute and to be evaluated fairly. |
| Oral Presentation | 50 | | Week 10 | HOURS= 30 Mins/Team | Each team is required to deliver a comprehensive verbal and visual presentation of their development proposal. The presentation should include an introduction of the team, background information on the project site, and discipline-specific content demonstrating how the proposal contributes to key areas such as planning and valuation, cost management, conservation, sustainability, and construction strategyThe presentation should conclude with a clear summary that highlights the proposal’s key benefits and unique selling points.All presentations will be evaluated by a review panel consisting of academic and industry professionals representing each relevant discipline. |
| Component 1 subtotal: | 50 | | |
| Component 2 subtotal: | 50 | | | | |
| Module subtotal: | 100 | | | | |