2026/7, Trimester 2, In Person,
VIEW FULL DETAILS
| Occurrence: | 001 |
| Primary mode of delivery: | In Person |
| Location of delivery: | MERCHISTON |
| Partner: | |
| Member of staff responsible for delivering module: | Stathis Tingas |
| Module Organiser: | |
| Student Activity (Notional Equivalent Study Hours (NESH)) |
| Mode of activity | Learning & Teaching Activity | NESH (Study Hours) | NESH Description |
| Face To Face | Lecture | 20 | Challenge + Abstract + guided teaching. Engineering question, short explicit teaching blocks, worked examples, prediction/concept questions and return to the opening challenge. |
| Face To Face | Tutorial | 20 | Solve stage using Core -» Apply -» Challenge. Individual paper-and-pencil mathematics remains central, with bounded engineering applications, peer reasoning where useful and rapid feedback. |
| Face To Face | Centrally Time Tabled Examination | 2 | The exam evaluates students’ understanding of core mathematical and engineering principles and their ability to apply this knowledge to the solution of complex problems. Through a series of timed questions, students will be expected to formulate and analyse mathematical models, drawing justified conclusions based on first principles and logical reasoning. |
| Online | Guided independent study | 136 | Reading, analytical and MATLAB practice, preparation for workshops/labs and assessments, revision, and consolidation of mathematical and computational methods. |
| Face To Face | Supervised time in studio/workshop | 20 | Explore + Verify & Transfer. MATLAB visualisation, parameter variation, analytical/numerical comparison, numerical ODE solution, verification of supplied outputs and cross-context transfer. Starter code may be used so programming syntax does not become a hidden prerequisite. |
| Face To Face | Tutorial | 2 | Revision class |
| Total Study Hours | 200 | |
| Expected Total Study Hours for Module | 200 | |
| Assessment |
| Type of Assessment | Weighting % | LOs covered | Week due | Length in Hours/Words | Description |
| Report | 50 | 1~2~3~4 | Week 7 | , WORDS= 1000 w | An individual, bounded engineering mathematics investigation released in Week 2 and submitted in Week 7. It is important that you can demonstrate that you have learnt and can independently apply the reasoning undertaken in this assessment, and your mark for this component will be confirmed through a compulsory verification task (see below). The assessment provides evidence of application of mathematical knowledge to engineering problems [M1], formulation and analysis leading to substantiated conclusions and recognition of assumptions and limitations [M2], and selection and application of appropriate analytical and computational techniques, including MATLAB, with verification of their results and limitations [M3]. |
| Centrally Time Tabled Examination | 50 | 1~2~3~4 | Exam Period | HOURS= 2 hours | The centrally timetabled examination provides protected individual evidence of mathematical competence across the whole module. It assesses clean analytical mathematics, selection of appropriate methods, interpretation of engineering results, and verification or diagnosis of supplied mathematical and computational outputs. The examination covers all learning outcomes, with greater emphasis on material not substantially evidenced in Assessment 1, including Euler's method and the second-order ODE block.Where appropriate, computational understanding may be assessed through supplied numerical or MATLAB-style outputs (as opposed to running a live environment), and/or by assessing the correctness of a supplied GenAI responseThe examination assesses students' ability to apply mathematical knowledge to engineering problems [M1], formulate and analyse problems and justify conclusions [M2], and select, interpret and verify appropriate analytical and computational approaches while recognising limitations [M3]. |
| Class Test | 0 | 1~2~3~4 | Week 8 | HOURS= 60 minutes | You will undertake a compulsory learning verification assessment under controlled conditions following submission of your engineering mathematics coursework (above) to evaluate your understanding of the analytical and computational methods used in your submitted work. To support inclusive approaches to assessment, you will have an option to choose the mode of verification. Verification carries no separate weighting but may result in an adjustment to the coursework mark and must be undertaken for the mark for the report to be recorded. Clear information around the mode of assessment and adjustments associated with verification will be detailed in your assessment brief. |
| Component 1 subtotal: | 50 | | |
| Component 2 subtotal: | 50 | | | | |
| Module subtotal: | 100 | | | | |