2022/3, Trimester 2, Face-to-Face, Edinburgh Napier University
VIEW FULL DETAILS
Occurrence: | 001 |
Primary mode of delivery: | Face-to-Face |
Location of delivery: | MERCHISTON |
Partner: | Edinburgh Napier University |
Member of staff responsible for delivering module: | James Mavor |
Module Organiser: | |
Learning, Teaching and Assessment (LTA) Approach: |
This module aims to develop student’s intellectual skills and to provide screenwriters with a contextual and theoretical foundation for their own future creative work. This module uses lectures, screenings and seminars together with independent study and formal essays to provide a variety of independent and group learning opportunities. Weekly classes use selected screenings stimulate discussion and debate around critical issues in a variety of screen works with a particular reference to the role of the screenwriter. (LO’s 1-4)Films and television drama are analysed and discussed in their historical, cultural, economic and aesthetic contexts. (LO 4) The role of the screenwriter is also subject to critical scrutiny, considering issues such as authorship, originality, authenticity and craftsmanship. Core concerns are to improve students’ analytical skills and their intellectual capacities to challenge conventional approaches to film and television production. (LO’s 1, 2 and 4)Students develop their historical and theoretical knowledge of film and television, as well as their critical capacities, and apply these in preparation of their two written assessments. Summative assessment s will be evaluated on the quality of critical abilities, research, argument, academic referencing and presentation skills. Participation in class is encouraged but not formally assessed. (LO’s 1-4)The first assessment is an academic essay worth 40% of the module mark. Here, students are asked to engage critically with certain theoretical concepts (e.g. genre). The second assessment is a case study. Here, students are encouraged to explore the work of a particular screenwriter or a particular screenwriting tool (e.g. Voice Over) in some depth. In both cases, the intention is that students use these assessments and the research and thinking involved as conceptual ground work for their own scripts in the Major Project module.
|
The University is currently undertaking work to improve the quality of information provided on methods of assessment and feedback. Please refer to the section on Learning and Teaching Approaches above for further information about this module’s learning, teaching and assessment practices, including formative and summative approaches.
|
The University is currently undertaking work to improve the quality of information provided on methods of assessment and feedback. Please refer to the section on Learning and Teaching Approaches above for further information about this module’s learning, teaching and assessment practices, including formative and summative approaches.
|
Student Activity (Notional Equivalent Study Hours (NESH)) |
Mode of activity | Learning & Teaching Activity | NESH (Study Hours) |
Face To Face | Lecture | 12 |
Face To Face | Project Supervision | 24 |
Independent Learning | Guided independent study | 164 |
| Total Study Hours | 200 |
| Expected Total Study Hours for Module | 200 |
Assessment |
Type of Assessment | Weighting % | LOs covered | Week due | Length in Hours/Words |
Essay | 40 | 1, 2 | 7 | HOURS= 0, WORDS= 2000 |
Essay | 60 | 1-4 | 13 | HOURS= 0, WORDS= 3000 |
Component 1 subtotal: | 40 | |
Component 2 subtotal: | 60 | | | |
Module subtotal: | 100 | | | |